Tvl. J J Spares And Selvakumar vs. The State Tax Officer

WP(MD)/8165/2025HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01036047202525 March 2025Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court noted the submission by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner has an appeal remedy before the Deputy Commissioner (GST Appeal), Madurai, under Section 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The Court directed that all grounds raised in the writ petition should be raised in the appeal. If an appeal is filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order, the appellate authority shall entertain it without reference to the period of limitation and dispose of it within three months. The Court made no order as to costs.

Facts

The petitioner, Tvl. J. J. Spares and Selvakumar, represented by its Proprietor Selvakumar, filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order dated 02.08.2024, passed by the respondent, the State Tax Officer, Ramanathapuram Assessment Circle, for the tax period 2019-2020. The petitioner contended that the assessment order was passed without providing sufficient opportunity, violating principles of natural justice. The respondent argued that a show cause notice (DRC 01) was issued on 26.12.2022, followed by personal hearing notices on 27.01.2023, 14.02.2023, and 07.05.2024, asserting that the petitioner had an alternative appeal remedy under Section 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017.

Key Issues

1. Whether the assessment order dated 02.08.2024, passed by the respondent for the year 2019-2020, is liable to be quashed for violation of the principles of natural justice due to insufficient opportunity provided to the petitioner? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that the assessment order was passed without affording sufficient opportunity, thus violating the principles of natural justice, and therefore, the order should be set aside and the proceedings redone. Respondent's contention: The respondent contended that the assessment order was passed after issuing a show cause notice and multiple personal hearing notices, and that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017, before the Deputy Commissioner (GST Appeal), Madurai, and thus the writ petition is not maintainable.

Sections Cited

Section 107

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: and

This writ petition is filed challenging the assessment order passed by the respondent, dated 02.08.2024, for the year 2019-2020. 2. The l

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.