Bharat Agarwal C/O Acelegal vs. Asst. Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, Div- Ii
Held
The Court was informed by the learned counsel for both parties that the proceedings pursuant to the show cause notice have been dropped by the respondent authorities. Consequently, the notices do not survive. In light of this development, the Court held that the petitions have been worked out and are accordingly disposed of. The reasoning is that the action challenged by the petitioners has been withdrawn by the respondent, thus resolving the dispute that formed the basis of the writ petitions. The operative direction is the disposal of the petitions as worked out.
Facts
The petitioners, including Ritika Agarwal, filed several writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions by the Assistant Commissioner GST and Central Excise Commissionerate. The core issue revolved around the liability of advocates to pay service tax. An interim order had been granted in these petitions on February 3, 2021. The petitioners' counsel informed the court that a similar petition, Writ Petition (Lodg.) No. 646 of 2021, was withdrawn by the petitioners because the revenue authorities had dropped the show cause notice. The respondent's counsel confirmed this factual assertion but stated that the interim order in the present petitions prevented them from deciding whether to take similar action.
Key Issues
1. Whether the present writ petitions have become infructuous in light of the show cause notices being dropped by the respondent authorities. The Petitioner's contention is that since the proceedings pursuant to the show cause notice have been dropped by the respondent authorities, the notices no longer survive, rendering the writ petitions infructuous. The Respondent's contention, as recorded in the order, is that while they confirm the factual assertion that the show cause notice proceedings have been dropped, the interim order previously granted in these petitions prevented them from proceeding to decide whether to take a similar course of action (dropping the show cause notice).
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
1 901 wp 515-21 and ors-c
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.515 OF 2021
Ritika Agarwal … Petitioner V/s. Assistant Commissioner GST and Central Excise Commissionerate … Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.517 OF 2021 WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.2179 OF 2021 WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.3394 OF 2021 --- Ms.Ayesha Ansari i/by M/s Acelegal, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP No.515 of 2021. Ms.Ritika Agarwal i/by M/s Acelegal, Advocate for the Petitioners in WP No.517 of 2021, WPST 2179 of 2021 and WPST 3394 of 2021. Mr.J.B.Mishra with Mr.Ram Ochani, Advocates of the Respondents in WPs No.515 of 2021, 517 of 2021 and WPST 2179 of 2021. Mr.J.B.Mishra with Mr.Dhananjay Deshmukh, Advocates for Respondents in WPST No.3394 of 2021. --- CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 22 FEBRUARY 2023. P.C.:-
On 23 January 2023 following order was passed: Priya Soparkar
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.