Prakash Rao Pawar vs. State Of Chhattisgarh

CRMP/847/2021HC ChhattisgarhGSTCNR CGHC01020788202124 August 2021Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court did not quash the criminal proceedings. Instead, it directed the learned District Magistrate First Class, Bemetara, to make an endeavor to complete the trial within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. This decision was made considering the case has been pending since 2016 and charges were framed in 2017. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's submission regarding the stage of evidence but opted for expediting the conclusion of the trial rather than terminating it. No specific finding was recorded on the merits of the charges themselves, as the petition was disposed of with a direction for speedy trial.

Facts

The petitioner, Prakash Rao Pawar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings initiated against him. The proceedings are pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bemetara, in Criminal Case No. 2272/2016 (previously numbered 1658/16). The charges relate to offences under Sections 294 and 506-B of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner's counsel stated that three witnesses had been examined, and six more were yet to be examined by the prosecution. The case has been pending since 2016, with charges framed on June 22, 2017. The High Court was asked to intervene in this ongoing criminal trial.

Key Issues

1. Whether the criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner under Sections 294 and 506-B of the Indian Penal Code in Criminal Case No. 2272/2016 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bemetara, should be quashed. The petitioner argued for quashing based on the prolonged pendency of the trial since 2016 and the stage of evidence. The State, represented by the Station House Officer, Police Station, Bemetara, and Zeba Khan (Excise Sub Inspector), did not appear to have presented any specific arguments against the quashing in the provided judgment excerpt. The court's focus was on expediting the trial rather than quashing the proceedings outright.

Sections Cited

Section 482

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 847 of 2021 Prakash Rao Pawar son of R. R. Pawar, aged about 56 years, resident of Shankar Nagar, Ward No. 1, in front of Dewangan Kirana Store, Mahasamund, Polce Station- Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.). ---- Petitioner Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Station House Officer, Police Station, Bemetara, District- Bemetara (C.G.).

2.

Zeba Khan D/o Shri A. B. Khan, aged about 34 years, Excise Sub Inspector, Currently posted Office of the Excise Commissioner, GST Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Naya Raipur (C.G.). ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Gurudev I. Sharan, G. A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 25.08.2021

1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing of Criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner in Criminal Case No. 2272/2016 (Earlier the case No. was 1658/16) before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bemetara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 294, 506-B of Indian Penal Code.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that three witnesses have alrea

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.