Ramlal Bhagat vs. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/4374/2022HC ChhattisgarhGSTCNR CGHC01020691202226 June 2022Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA CHANDRA SINGH SAMANT2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file a representation before Respondent No. 1 within 7 days. Respondent No. 1 is directed to consider the representation and make a decision at the earliest, preferably within 21 days from the date of receipt of the order and representation. Furthermore, the implementation of the transfer order is stayed until the representation is filed and decided within the stipulated time frame. The Court did not make a definitive finding on whether the transfer order violated the policy, deferring the decision pending the representation's consideration.

Facts

The petitioner, Ramlal Bhagat, an Excise Officer aged 61, was transferred from Jashpur to Kabirdham by an order dated June 22, 2022. He contends that this transfer is contrary to the State Government's transfer policy, and given his age and nearing retirement, he should have been accommodated at his preferred location. The State counsel suggested that the petitioner could file a representation, which would then be considered by the respondents. The Court heard arguments from both sides regarding this transfer.

Key Issues

1. Whether the transfer order dated June 22, 2022, issued by the respondents, is in contravention of the State Government's transfer policy, considering the petitioner's age and position in his career? Petitioner's argument: The petitioner argued that the transfer is against the transfer policy of the State Government. He emphasized his age of 61 years, stating that at the end of his career, he should have been given an adjustment at a place of his choice. Revenue/State's argument: The State counsel opposed the petitioner's submissions and suggested that the petitioner could file a representation, which would be considered by the respondents.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

-1- NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 4374 of 2022 Ramlal Bhagat S/o Late Shri Sukhiya Ram Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Bankitoli, P.S. Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Commercial Tax (Excise), Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2.

Excise Commissioner, North Block, Sector 19, GST Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3.

District Excise Officer, Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For the Petitioner

: Ms. Pragya Pandey, Advocate. For the Respondents/State : Shri Kunal Das, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice

Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

Order on Board 27-06-2022 Heard.

1.

It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been transferred from the post of Excise Officer, District Jashpur to Excise Officer, District Kabirdham by the impugned order dated 22.6.2022. The grievance of the petitioner is that this transfer is against the transfer policy of the State Government. The petitioner is aged about 61 years, therefore, at the end of his

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.