Gajanana Krishna Hegde vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of

WP/23786/2026HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01052378202629 September 2026Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. SUBRAHMANYA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAMANANDA KULALA, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SMT. JYOTI M. MARADI, HCGP
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court allowed the petition in part. It held that the petitioner, who pleaded bonafides for failing to respond to the Show Cause Notice, should be given another opportunity. This opportunity is conditional upon the petitioner offering to pay all applicable tax, penalty, and interest as justified by law. The Order of Cancellation of GST dated 11.11.2024 was quashed, restoring the proceedings for reconsideration. The petitioner was granted liberty to file a response to the Show Cause Notice dated 08.10.2024 by 30.10.2026, along with the pending returns and offering the required tax, demand, and interest.

Facts

The petitioner, Gajanan Krishna Hegde, a proprietorship, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of his GST registration. The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes issued a Show Cause Notice dated 08.10.2024, followed by an Order of Cancellation of Registration dated 11.11.2024. The cancellation was based on the petitioner's failure to file GST returns continuously for over six months. The petitioner contended that he had provided his accountant's email, but the accountant, due to low turnover, did not follow up, and the petitioner, due to bonafide reasons, also failed to follow up.

Key Issues

1. Whether the cancellation of GST registration under Rule 21A(2A) of the CGST Rules, 2017, is justified when the petitioner pleads bonafide reasons for non-compliance and seeks an opportunity to rectify the situation? The petitioner argued that he relied on bonafide circumstances and, if given an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice, he would file the pending returns and demonstrate bonafides by paying the due tax, penalty, and interest. The respondent, represented by the High Court Government Pleader, was heard.

Sections Cited

Rule 21A(2A), Rule 22(1), Rule 22(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 - HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010523782026 NC: 2026:KHC:53852 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 23786 OF 2026 (T-RES)

BETWEEN:

GAJANANA KRISHNA HEGDE, A PROPRIETORSHIP REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR, S/O KRISHNA GANAPATHI HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, NO.3, OLD 18, 12TH MAIN, SRINAGAR, BANASHANKARI 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE-560085 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUBRAHMANYA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAMANANDA KULALA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, LGSTO 060 NO. 642, PIONEER PLAZA, KENCHENAHALLI MAIN ROAD, NEAR RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560098 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. JYOTI M. MARADI, HCGP) VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HC-KAR

CNR: KAHC010523782026 NC: 2026:KHC:53852 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OF THE SHOW CAU

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.