D.S. Muthuchamy vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Held
The Court, while acknowledging the petitioner's failure to participate in the proceedings, was inclined to provide relief. The Court quashed the impugned assessment order dated 30.04.2024 on the condition that the petitioner deposits 25% of the disputed tax within 30 days from the receipt of the order. The petitioner was also directed to file a reply to the show cause notice within a specified time. The quashed order was to be treated as an addendum to the show cause notice, and the respondent was directed to pass a fresh order on merits expeditiously, preferably within three months after hearing the petitioner. The Court made it clear that failure to comply with these conditions would result in the writ petition being deemed dismissed, allowing the respondents to proceed as per the GST enactments.
Facts
The petitioner, D.S.Muthuchamy, filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order dated 30.04.2024, passed by the Deputy State Tax Officer - 2, Palani-II Assessment Circle, for the tax period April 2018 to March 2019. The impugned order was preceded by a notice in Form GST DRC 01 dated 27.12.2023 and three reminders. The petitioner did not participate in the proceedings, leading to an adverse order. The petitioner's explanation for non-participation was that the notices were issued on the web portal, which they failed to notice, and consequently, they also failed to notice the passing of the impugned order.
Key Issues
1. Whether the assessment order dated 30.04.2024, passed by the Deputy State Tax Officer - 2, should be quashed on the grounds that the petitioner failed to notice the notices issued on the web portal, leading to their non-participation in the proceedings. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that their failure to notice the notices and the subsequent order was due to the electronic mode of communication via the web portal, and therefore, the adverse order should be set aside. Revenue's contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the revenue or state.
Sections Cited
GST DRC 01
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: and
The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order d
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.