Rajapalayam Cement And Chemicals LTD vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)
Facts
The petitioner, Tvl.Rajapalayam Cement & Chemicals Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an ex-parte order passed by the respondent, The Assistant Commissioner(ST), Rajapalayam, on 08.08.2024. The order was for the assessment year 2019-20. The petitioner contended that the order was passed without jurisdiction and in clear violation of statutory provisions. The appeal period for the impugned order had already expired. The petitioner sought to quash the order. The respondent is the revenue authority.
Held
The Court acknowledged that the petitioner had suffered an ex-parte order and that the appeal period had expired. Instead of quashing the order outright, the Court permitted the petitioner to file an appeal within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, with the appeal to be entertained without reference to limitation. As a condition for this relief, the petitioner was required to pay 10% of the disputed tax amount as pre-deposit. The Court stated that if the petitioner failed to remit the pre-deposit or file the appeal within the stipulated thirty days, the benefit of this order would stand recalled automatically. The Court did not decide on the merits of the petitioner's claim regarding lack of jurisdiction or violation of statutory provisions, as the matter was disposed of by granting liberty to appeal.
Key Issues
1. Whether the ex-parte order dated 08.08.2024, issued by the respondent for the assessment year 2019-20, is liable to be quashed on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction and violation of statutory provisions? The petitioner argued that the order was passed without jurisdiction and in violation of statutory provisions. The respondent did not record any specific arguments in the judgment.
Sections Cited
None explicitly mentioned in the provided text, but the context implies provisions related to appeals and ex-parte orders under GST law.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Heard both sides. 2.The petitioner suffered an exparte order at the hands of the respondent. The order was passed on
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.