Tvl. Rajapalayam Cement And Chemicals LTD vs. The Commercial Tax Officer

WP(MD)/32835/2025HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01165605202517 November 2025Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Tvl. Rajapalayam Cement & Chemicals Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an ex-parte order passed by the respondent, The Assistant Commissioner(ST), Rajapalayam 1 Assessment Circle, on 29.11.2024. The order was for the assessment year 2021-22. The petitioner contended that the order was passed without jurisdiction and in clear violation of statutory provisions. The appeal period for the impugned order had already expired by the time the writ petition was filed.

Held

The Court acknowledged that the petitioner had suffered an ex-parte order and that the appeal period had expired. Instead of quashing the order directly, the Court permitted the petitioner to file an appeal within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of the Court's order. This appeal was to be entertained without reference to the limitation period. However, the petitioner was required to pay 10% of the disputed tax amount as a pre-deposit. The Court stipulated that if the petitioner failed to remit the pre-deposit or file the appeal within the specified thirty days, the benefit granted by this order would stand automatically recalled. The Court did not decide on the merits of the petitioner's claim regarding jurisdiction or violation of statutory provisions.

Key Issues

1. Whether the impugned order dated 29.11.2024, passed by the respondent, is without jurisdiction and in violation of statutory provisions, warranting quashing under Article 226 of the Constitution of India? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the ex-parte order was passed without jurisdiction and in violation of statutory provisions. They sought to quash the order. Respondent's Contention: The respondent did not file a counter affidavit or present arguments on the merits of the case. The judgment notes that the appeal period had expired, implying a procedural hurdle for the petitioner.

Sections Cited

Article 226

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
1 W.P.(MD)NO.32835 OF 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.32835 of 2025 AND W.M.P.(MD)Nos.25903 & 25906 of 2025 Tvl.Rajapalayam Cement & Chemicals Ltd., Rep. by its Director T.Venkatarajagopalan, 33AAACR7431B1ZX, Shenthattia Puram Pudur, Arunkankulam, Rajapalayam ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner(ST), Rajapalayam 1 Assessment Circle, Rajapalayam. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in the impugned order in form GST DRC 07 Ref.No.ZD3311242909954 dated 29.11.2024 for the assessment year 2021-22 issued by the respondent and quash the same as it is without jurisdiction and clear violation of statutory provisions. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karunakar For Respondent : Mr.J.K.Jeyaselan, Government Advocate. * * * 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 W.P.(MD)NO.32835 OF 2025

Heard both sides. 2.The petitioner suffered an exparte order at the hands of the respondent. The order was passed on 2

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.