The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise vs. The Coronation Fireworks Factory
Facts
The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Madurai Commissionerate (Appellant) filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court against the final order FO/A/40306/2024-EX(DB) dated 20.03.2024 passed by the CESTAT, Chennai. The Respondent is The Coronation Fireworks Factory. The appeal was filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the provided judgment excerpt. The procedural history leading to the CESTAT order is not detailed.
Held
The Court did not decide the merits of the appeal. Instead, the learned counsel for the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which was granted. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs were awarded. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn and close the connected miscellaneous petition. No issues were expressly left undecided as the appeal was withdrawn.
Key Issues
The Court had to decide whether to allow the appeal filed by the Commissioner of GST and Central Excise. The appellant sought to set aside the final order of the CESTAT. The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by either side. The appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal, and an endorsement to that effect was made. Therefore, no specific legal questions or contentions were argued or decided on merits by the High Court.
Sections Cited
Section 35G
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :04.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA and CMP(MD) No.1189of 2026 The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise Madurai Commissionerate Central Revenue Building Bibikulam, Madurai- 625 002 ... Appellant vs. The Coronation Fireworks Factory No.7, Chairman A Shanmugam Road, Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu- 626 123 ...Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to allow the appeal and set aside the final order FO/A/40306/2024-EX(DB) dated 20.03.2024 on the file of the CESTAT, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Jaikumar Page No.1 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. AND R. POORNIMA,J. aav JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was made by G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
In view of the same, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Conseque
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.