Ms New Pavatiya Paint And Varnish Udyoh vs. Union Of INDIA

WPMB/288/2026HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01006440202628 April 2026Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioner, MS New Pavatiya Paint and Varnish Udyoh, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital. The respondents included the Union of India and others. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Piyush Garg, made brief submissions and subsequently prayed for the withdrawal of the writ petition. The prayer was made with the liberty to file a fresh writ petition if any assessment order was passed against the petitioner for the realization of GST on royalty amount. The court considered this prayer.

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's explicit request to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. This liberty was granted specifically in the event that an assessment order is passed against the petitioner for the realization of GST on royalty amount. The operative direction was to dispose of the petition as withdrawn with the granted liberty. No specific issues regarding GST law or the assessment of royalty were decided, as the petition was withdrawn at the preliminary stage.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to withdraw the writ petition with the right to file a fresh petition if an assessment order concerning GST on royalty is passed. The petitioner argued that they wished to withdraw the current petition to potentially file a fresh one later, depending on future assessment orders related to GST on royalty. The respondents did not appear to contest this request, as the judgment notes the presence of counsel for the petitioner and respondents but does not record any specific arguments against the withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2026:UHC:3212-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 28th April, 2026 Writ Petition (M/B) No. 288 of 2026 MS New Pavatiya Paint and Varnish Udyoh ------Petitioner Versus Union of India & others -----Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India. Mr. Shobhit Saharia and Ms. Ridhi Joshi, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 & 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

1.

Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the petitioners after making brief submissions prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition, in case, any assessment order is passed against the petitioner for realization of GST on royalty amount.

2.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in term

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.