Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise Commissionerate vs. M/S Bee Am Industries PVT LTD

CEXA/30/2017HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01003161201724 September 2021Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court allowed the withdrawal application filed by the appellant. The Court noted the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant did not want to press the matter any further and wished to withdraw the Appeal. In view of this submission and the averments in the withdrawal application, the application was allowed. Consequently, the Central Excise Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No specific provisions of the CGST Act or Central Excise Act were discussed in relation to the merits of the case, as the appeal was withdrawn.

Facts

The appellant, Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Commissionrate, Dehradun, filed Central Excise Appeal No. 30 of 2017 against M/s Bee Am Industries Pvt. Ltd. The appeal was filed before the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital. The respondent, M/s Bee Am Industries Pvt. Ltd., was not represented before the Court. The appellant filed a withdrawal application (CLMA No. 16120 of 2019) seeking to withdraw the appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appellant should be permitted to withdraw the appeal. This issue arises from the appellant's submission that they do not wish to press the matter further. The respondent did not present any arguments. The Court had to decide whether to allow the withdrawal application based on the appellant's request.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ON THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021 BEFORE: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No. 30 of 2017 BETWEEN: Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise Commissionrate, Dehradun. ....Appellant (By Mr. Imraj Singh Rautela, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate) AND: M/s Bee Am Industries Pvt. Ltd. …..Respondent (There is no representation for the respondent) This Appeal coming on for hearing this day, Hon’ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. delivered the following

Judgment:

JUDGEMENT

This withdrawal application (CLMA No. 16120 of 2019) has been filed on behalf of the appellant.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not want to press the matter any further and he wants to withdraw the Appeal.

3.

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant and also in view of the averments made in the withdrawal application, withdrawal application is allowed. Consequently, the Central Excise Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.