Naveen Aggarwal vs. State Of Uttarakhand
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
2026
WPMB No. 299 of 2026 Mohammad Javed
--Petitioner
Versus Superintendent Cgst
--Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
Mr. Pankaj Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondent.
Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondent is in receipt of instructions. He prays for, and is granted three weeks’ time to file counter affidavit.
List thereafter.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.) 20.05.2026 20.05.2026 Rahul
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.