M/S Divergent Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttarakhand

WPMB/707/2026HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01015374202610 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Divergent Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 20.05.2026 passed by respondent no. 3 under Section 73 of the CGST/UKGST Act, 2017, for financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The petition also challenged summaries in Form GST DRC-07 dated 22.05.2023, and orders/summaries in Form GST DRC-07 dated 13.12.2023 for FY 2017-18 and dated 05.08.2024 for FY 2019-20. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition to pursue the remedy of appeal. The Revenue had no objection to this request.

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court noted that the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition to avail the remedy of appeal against the orders passed under Section 73 of the CGST/UKGST Act, 2017, and the related GST DRC-07 summaries for various financial years. The Revenue did not object to this course of action. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the appellate remedy. No specific findings were made on the merits of the case as the petition was withdrawn. The operative direction was to permit withdrawal and grant liberty to appeal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to avail the remedy of appeal, considering the stage of the proceedings and the availability of an appellate mechanism? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner, through its counsel, prayed for the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to avail the statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned orders and summaries. Revenue's Argument: The learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue stated that they had no objection to the petitioner's request for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal.

Sections Cited

Section 73

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
UKHC010153742026 2026:UHC:8142-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 707 OF 2026 M/s Divergent Industries Pvt. Ltd. …...Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Anuray Sahay, learned counsel through video conferencing with Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, learned counsel. Counsel for the State : Ms. Puja Banga, learned Standing Counsel through video conferencing.

JUDGMENT :(per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

1.

In the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the orders dated 20.05.2026, passed by respondent no.3 under Section 73 of the CGST/ UKGST Act, 2017 for financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20, and the summaries in Form GST DRC-07, dated 22.05.2023; the orders/ summaries in Form GST DRC- 07 dated 13.12.2023 for the Financial Year 2017-18 and dated 05.08.2024 for the Financial Year 2019-20. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal.

1

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.