Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan Mandal vs. Enforcement Directorate
Facts
The applicant, Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan Mandal, filed a bail application before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur. The respondent was the Enforcement Directorate, Government of India. The applicant sought permission to withdraw the bail application with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies. The Court heard the learned counsel for both the applicant and the respondent.
Held
The Court allowed the applicant's prayer to withdraw the bail application. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court granted the applicant liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies as available to him under the law. No specific findings were made on the merits of the bail application itself, as it was withdrawn by the applicant. The Court directed the registry to return the certified copy of Annexure P-1 after retaining its photocopy.
Key Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under the relevant provisions of law, considering the nature of the alleged offense and the stage of the proceedings? (This is implied by the filing of a bail application). Contentions: Petitioner/Applicant: Sought permission to withdraw the bail application to pursue other legal remedies available under the law. Revenue/Respondent: No specific arguments recorded in the judgment regarding the merits of the bail application, as the applicant sought withdrawal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet MCRCA No. 273 of 2022 • Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan Mandal S/o Naresh Mandal Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Chattu Dhanaama, Post - Kakaan, Jaamui, Bihar ---- Applicant Versus • Enforcement Directorate Government Of India, Through Assistant Director, Raipur Sub Zonal Office, At - 303, A-B Block, Cgst Building, New Dhamtari Raod, Tikrapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent 25/02/2022 Jyoti Shri Lukesh Mishra, Counsel for the Applicant.
Dr. Saurabh Pande along with Shri Anil S. Pandey, Counsel for Respondent.
Heard Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy as available to him under the law.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid observation.
Registry is directed to return the certified copy of Annexure P-1 after retaining the photo copy of the same. (Goutam Bhaduri)
Judge
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.