Jk Lakshmi Cement Limited vs. State Of Chhattisgarh
Facts
The petitioner, JK Lakshmi Cement Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur. The petition was directed against the State of Chhattisgarh and its tax authorities, including the Joint Commissioner State Tax (Appeal) and the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax. The specific order or action under challenge and the tax period(s) are not detailed in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is not elaborated.
Held
The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or decide any substantive issues. Based on the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the relief prayed for in the writ petition had already been granted, the Court permitted the withdrawal of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No specific legal principles were established or discussed, and no operative directions beyond the dismissal were issued. The Court did not leave any issue undecided as the matter was settled by the petitioner's request.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioner was entitled to the relief prayed for in the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the relief sought had already been granted. The State's arguments or contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The Court did not have to decide any specific question of law or fact as the matter was resolved by the petitioner's submission.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3069 of 2023 • JK Lakshmi Cement Limited through the Sr. Vice President, Malpurikhurd, Ahiwara, Tahsil Dhamdha, Dist. Durg Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department Of Commercial Tax- Gst, Mahanadi Bhawa, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
The Joint Commissioner State Tax (Appeal), Durg Division, Malviya Nagar Chowk, State Tax Office, Durg (C.G.)
Asst. Commissioner, State Tax, Durg, Circle 3, Durg (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Raj Shengale, Advocate on behalf of Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board 07/11
/20
23
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the relief prayed for in this writ petition has been granted and, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 1. (Parth Prateem Sahu)
Judge Shayna
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.