M/S Sri Sai Infrastructure vs. C.G. State Warehousing Corporation
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Sri Sai Infrastructure, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, alleging inaction by the respondents (C.G. State Warehousing Corporation and its officials) in refunding GST collected from the petitioner. The petitioner was awarded a contract during the GST regime with a 12% tax rate, which was later increased to 18% during the contract's execution. Despite repeated approaches, the respondents had not processed the GST refund. The respondent Corporation indicated that the claim would be decided after verification of facts.
Held
The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent authorities to immediately process the petitioner's claim for the refund of GST. This processing is to be done after due verification of facts and the petitioner's entitlement. The Court emphasized that an appropriate decision should be taken, taking into account the petitioner's contention that similar GST refunds have been granted by the government in cases involving other departments. The respondents were given an outer limit of 90 days from the receipt of the order to take an appropriate decision. The Court did not explicitly decide on the petitioner's entitlement to the refund but directed the process to commence.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Court should direct the respondents to process the petitioner's claim for refund of GST collected during the execution of the contract, considering the alleged inaction of the respondents? The petitioner argued that the respondents have failed to refund the GST collected from them, despite repeated representations. They contended that the GST rate increased during the contract execution, necessitating a refund of the excess collected amount. The petitioner also pointed out that in similar cases with other government departments like PWD, PMGSY, NHAI, Railways, and CPWD, the government itself has refunded the GST. The respondents, through their counsel, submitted that the claim of the petitioner shall be decided at the earliest, subject to the verification of facts.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No.871 of 2024 M/s Sri Sai Infrastructure Having Its Office At 3rd Floor, A-310, Crystal Arcade, Near Avanti Bai Chowk, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Partner Shri Rupesh Kumar Singhal S/o Shri Anjani Agrawal, Agaed About 45 Years, R/o Flat No. B1-502, Sapphire Emperia, Ama Seoni, G.S.I. Riapur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus
C.G. State Warehousing Corporation Head Office Village Jhanjh, Sector-24 Atal Nagar, Raipur, C.G. Through Its Managing Director
Managing Director C.G. State Warehousing Corporation, Head Office Village Jhanjh, Sector-24 Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
Executive Engineer C.G. State Warehousing Corporation, Head Office Village Jhanjh, Sector-24 Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Harsh Wardhan Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Shivraj Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 13.02.2024 1) The whole grievance of the petitione
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Chhattisgarh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.