Hindustan Sanitaryware And Industries Limited vs. The Asst.Commissioner
Facts
The petitioner, Hindustan Sanitaryware & Industries Limited (now HSIL Limited), filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala challenging an assessment order (Ext.P8) passed against them under the Kerala Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act. The petitioner's primary contention was that they were not afforded an opportunity of a personal hearing before the assessing authority passed the impugned order. This, according to the petitioner, violated the principles of natural justice. The respondent was the Assistant Commissioner, Special Circle-III, SGST Department.
Held
The Court held that the assessment order (Ext.P8) was vitiated by a violation of the rules of natural justice because the petitioner was not afforded a personal hearing before its passing. The Court accepted the submission of the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner had not been heard. Consequently, the Court quashed Ext.P8 order. The respondent was directed to pass fresh orders after providing the petitioner with an opportunity to be heard, either through video conferencing or personal appearance. The respondent was mandated to pass these fresh orders within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The ratio decidendi is that an assessment order passed without affording the assessee a proper opportunity of hearing is invalid and liable to be set aside.
Key Issues
1. Whether the assessment order (Ext.P8) passed by the respondent is vitiated by a non-compliance with the rules of natural justice, specifically the requirement of affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner? The petitioner argued that the assessment order was passed without providing them with a proper hearing, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The respondent, through the learned Government Pleader, conceded that the petitioner was indeed not heard prior to the passing of Ext.P8 order. No other arguments were recorded for either side.
Sections Cited
KVAT Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020/16TH SRAVANA, 1942 W.P(C).No.16177 OF 2020(V) PETITIONER: HINDUSTAN SANITARYWARE & INDUSTRIES LIMITED, (NOW KNOWN AS HSIL LIMITED), DOOR NO.15/367A, PUTHIYA ROAD, KANGARAPADY, VADACODE, KAMALASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682021. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY LATHEESH KUMAR M.P. BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SHRI.RAHUL A. SMT.APARNA ANIL RESPONDENT: THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL CIRCLE-III, SGST DEPARTMENT, THEVARA, KOCHI-682015. BY SMT.DR.THUSHARA JAMES, GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.08.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No.16177/2020 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P8 assessment order passed against him under the KVAT Act. In the writ petition the contention urged by the petitioner is essentially that, before passing Ext.P8 order, the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity of hearing in which he could have raised his contentions before the assessing authority. It is, there
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.