Tara Sanitary Wares vs. The Assistant Commissioner Iii

WA/1028/2019HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01025927201907 July 2022Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

The appellant, M/s. Tara Sanitary Wares, represented by its Managing Partner Jose Kuriakose, filed a writ appeal before the High Court of Kerala. This appeal was against a judgment dated January 22, 2019, passed in W.P.(C) No.41764/2018. The respondents were the Assistant Commissioner III, Special Circle, SGST Department, Thiruvananthapuram, the State of Kerala, and the Union of India. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the provided judgment excerpt. The procedural history leading to the writ appeal is also not detailed.

Held

The Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the writ appeal. In doing so, the Court granted the appellant liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Thiruvananthapuram. The appellant was given two weeks' time from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment to file this statutory appeal. The reasoning behind this decision is not elaborated in the provided excerpt, but it indicates the Court's willingness to permit a party to pursue a statutory remedy when it is available and deemed appropriate. No specific issues regarding GST provisions were decided on merits, as the appeal was withdrawn.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the appellant should be allowed to withdraw the writ appeal. The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal to pursue a statutory remedy. The Court had to decide whether to grant this withdrawal and, if so, whether to grant liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant's contention was that they wished to avail the statutory appeal mechanism. The respondents' contentions are not recorded in the provided judgment excerpt. The core legal question revolved around the Court's discretion to permit withdrawal of a writ appeal and grant liberty for alternative remedies, particularly when a statutory appeal is available.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI THUR AY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1944 W.A.NO.1028 OF 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.01.2019 IN W.P.(C) NO.41764/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA. APPELLANT/PETITIONER: M/S. TARA SANITARY WARES, MENATHOTTAM CHAMBERS, OPP.SBI, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER JOSE KURIAKOSE. BY ADVS. S. ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) RAJAGOPAL M. RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER III, SPECIAL CIRCLE, SGST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 002. 2 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.46, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001. R1&R2 SRI. V.K. SHAMSUDHEEN, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER R3 SRI. K.K.RAVINDRANATH, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL SRI. KIRAN, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMI

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.