M/S Excelsior Motors Private Limited vs. The Registrar

WP(C)/22632/2022HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01046969202213 July 2022Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.3 pages
For Petitioner: LIZA MEGHAN CYRIAC, JOLLY JOHN, IRENE BABUFor Respondent: ADV. JASMIN M M (GP)
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Excelsior Motors Private Limited, is aggrieved by recovery proceedings initiated for amounts due under an assessment order for the year 2013-2014. The petitioner had filed an appeal (Ext.P3) along with a stay petition (Ext.P4) before the Kerala Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had scheduled the hearing for the appeal and stay petition for September 12, 2022. In the interim, the petitioner received a notice under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act (Ext.P6). Following this, the petitioner filed an application for early hearing of the stay petition (Ext.P7) before the Tribunal. The writ petition was filed before the High Court seeking relief against the revenue recovery proceedings.

Held

The Court held that the revenue recovery proceedings initiated pursuant to Ext.P6 should be kept in abeyance until a decision is taken on the stay application (Ext.P4) filed by the petitioner before the 1st respondent Tribunal. The Court reasoned that since a stay application had been filed along with the appeal, and the petitioner had also filed an application for early hearing of the stay petition, it was appropriate to pause the recovery actions. The Court directed the 1st respondent Tribunal to endeavor to pass orders on the stay application within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the judgment. No specific issue was left undecided, as the Court granted interim relief pending the Tribunal's decision.

Key Issues

1. Whether the revenue recovery proceedings can be continued while an appeal and a stay petition are pending before the Appellate Tribunal, and an application for early hearing of the stay petition has been filed? The petitioner argued that the revenue recovery proceedings were premature and oppressive, given that their appeal and stay application were already filed and pending before the Tribunal. They highlighted the filing of an application for early hearing of the stay petition as evidence of their attempt to expedite the resolution of the matter. The petitioner sought to have the revenue recovery proceedings kept in abeyance until the Tribunal decided on their stay application. The respondents, represented by the Government Pleader, did not appear to have presented any specific arguments against the petitioner's plea for a stay on recovery proceedings during the hearing.

Sections Cited

Kerala Revenue Recovery Act

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNE AY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 22632 OF 2022 PETITIONER: M/S EXCELSIOR MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED SUITE NO 205-206, 2ND FLOOR, PIONEER TOWERS, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, MARINE DRIVE, COCHIN 682031, PIN - 682031 BY ADVS. LIZA MEGHAN CYRIAC JOLLY JOHN IRENE BABU RESPONDENTS: 1 THE REGISTRAR KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 6TH FLOOR, SGST DEPARTMENT COMPLEX, THEVARA, KOCHI, PIN - 682015 2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER APPEALS SGST DEPARTMENT, SPECIAL CIRCLE-III, THEVARA, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682015 3 STATE TAX OFFICER REVENUE RECOVERY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, FIRST FLOOR CIVIL STATION KAKKANADU, KANAYANOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM , PIN - 682030 OTHER PRESENT: ADV. JASMIN M M (GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P (C) No.22632/2022 -2- J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this court being aggrieved by the fact that the amounts due in terms of an order for assessment for the year 2013-2014 are sought to be recovered. Though the petitioner has

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.