Commissioner Of Central GST vs. M/S Torus Business Solutions PVT LTD

STA/14/2019HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01052929201924 May 2019Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL,MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court allowed the appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn. The Court granted the liberty to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal as prayed for. It was clarified that the withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue would not be considered an affirmation of the Tribunal's order on merits. The Court also stated that the legal issue, as claimed by the revenue, was being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. No specific finding was given on the merits of the case, as the appeal was withdrawn.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST, Gurugram Commissionerate (appellant-revenue) filed an appeal against an order of the Tribunal. The appeal was filed with a delay of 258 days. The tax effect involved in the matter was ₹14,99,931/-. The appellant-revenue sought to withdraw the appeal in view of a notification issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, New Delhi, which sets monetary limits for filing appeals. The appellant prayed for liberty to revive the appeal if any aspect of it survived.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal filed by the revenue should be dismissed as withdrawn in light of the tax effect and the relevant notification? The appellant-revenue argued that due to the tax effect of ₹14,99,931/-, they should be allowed to withdraw the appeal as per Notification No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 11.7.2018, issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. They further prayed for liberty to revive the appeal if any aspect of it survived. The respondent, M/s Torus Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd., did not record any argument in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH STA-14-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.5.2019 Commissioner of Central GST, Gurugram Commissionerate, Gurugram ...Appellant. Versus M/s Torus Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram

...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL. PRESENT: Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1.

Delay of 258 days' in re-filing the appeal is condoned.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the tax effect involved is ` 14,99,931/-, he may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal in view of Notification No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 11.7.2018, issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, New Delhi. However, he has prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue as claimed by the revenue is being left open to

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.