Bmr Polymers PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And Others
Held
The provided excerpt does not contain the Court's decision or reasoning on any specific issue. It merely states that a detailed order was passed on the same date in a related review application. Consequently, there is no finding on any issue, no reasoning provided, and no operative directions or relief granted that can be extracted from this text. The judgment does not record any specific holdings or ratio decidendi relevant to the review application itself.
Facts
This judgment concerns a Review Application (RA No. 522 of 2019) filed by the GST Authorities in relation to a previous Civil Writ Petition (CWP No. 7798 of 2019). The specific details of the original petition, including the petitioner, respondents, tax period, amount in dispute, and the order or action under challenge, are not explicitly detailed in this excerpt. However, it is evident that the GST Authorities are seeking a review of a decision previously made by the High Court in CWP No. 7798 of 2019. The procedural history indicates that the current judgment is a review application filed subsequent to the original writ petition.
Key Issues
The provided text does not explicitly state the issues that the Court had to decide in the Review Application. It also does not record any arguments made by either side. The excerpt only indicates that a detailed order was passed on the same date in a related matter (RA-CW-506-2019 in CWP No. 28203 of 2019, titled M/s Groupe SEB India Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.). Therefore, the specific legal questions and contentions of the parties regarding the review application are not available in this excerpt.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
#1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Date of Decision:-10.01.2020 BMR Polymers Pvt. Ltd. ......Petitioner. Verus Union of India & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LALIT BATRA Present:- Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate & Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate for review applicants/ GST Authorities. Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amit Parsad, Advocate for the non applicant/Petitioner in RA-CW-557-2019 in CWP No.17676 of 2019. Mr. Surjeet Bhadu, Advocate & Mr. Veer Singh, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-515-2019 in CWP No.5983 of 2019, RA-CW-501-2019 in CWP No.5977 & RA-CW-513-2019 in CWP No.4248 of 2019. Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-514 of 2019 in CWP No.24809 of 2019 & RA-CW-500-2019 in CWP No.25303 of 2019. Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-506 of 2019 in CWP No.28203 of 2019 . Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Agnihotri, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitione
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.