Pharma Logistics vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors

RA-CW/550/2019HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01146957201910 January 2020Bench: MR JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH,MR. JUSTICE LALIT BATRA2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court, in its oral order, directed that the detailed order for this review application would be the same as the order passed on the same date in RA-CW-506-2019 in CWP No. 28203 of 2019, titled M/s Groupe SEB India Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Without the content of that detailed order, it is impossible to ascertain the specific findings on the issues, the reasoning, or the ratio decidendi. Consequently, the operative directions and the final outcome for this specific review application are not recorded in the provided text. Any issue expressly left undecided is also not discernible from this excerpt.

Facts

This judgment concerns Review Application No. 550 of 2019, filed in Civil Writ Petition No. 6590 of 2019 before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana. The review applicants are the GST Authorities, and the non-applicant is Pharma Logistics, the petitioner in the original writ petition. The specific tax periods and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in this excerpt. The procedural history indicates that this review application is being decided alongside other similar review applications, with the detailed order to be found in a related case, M/s Groupe SEB India Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Key Issues

1. Whether the GST Authorities are entitled to a review of the High Court's previous order in CWP No. 6590 of 2019. This issue turns on the grounds for review available under the relevant procedural rules. The GST Authorities, as review applicants, likely argued that there were errors apparent on the face of the record, a discovery of new and important matter or evidence, or any other sufficient reason justifying a review. Pharma Logistics, as the non-applicant, would have contended that no grounds for review were met, arguing that the original order was correctly passed and no review is warranted. The specific provisions of law governing review applications would be central to this argument.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

#1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Date of Decision:-10.01.2020 Pharma Logistics. ......Petitioner. Verus Union of India & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LALIT BATRA Present:- Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate & Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate for review applicants/ GST Authorities. Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amit Parsad, Advocate for the non applicant/Petitioner in RA-CW-557-2019 in CWP No.17676 of 2019. Mr. Surjeet Bhadu, Advocate & Mr. Veer Singh, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-515-2019 in CWP No.5983 of 2019, RA-CW-501-2019 in CWP No.5977 & RA-CW-513-2019 in CWP No.4248 of 2019. Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-514 of 2019 in CWP No.24809 of 2019 & RA-CW-500-2019 in CWP No.25303 of 2019. Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-506 of 2019 in CWP No.28203 of 2019 . Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Agnihotri, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.