Universal Motors vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors
Held
The High Court has not provided a detailed decision in this specific excerpt. Instead, it has directed that the detailed order for this matter can be found in another case, RA-CW-506-2019 in CWP No.28203 of 2019, titled M/s Groupe SEB India Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Therefore, the findings on the specific issues, the reasoning, and the ratio decidendi are not available within this document. No operative directions or relief granted are mentioned here, nor are any issues expressly left undecided. The excerpt solely serves as a reference to a more comprehensive order.
Facts
This matter concerns multiple Review Applications filed by GST authorities seeking review of orders passed by the High Court in various Civil Writ Petitions (CWPs). The original CWPs were filed by various petitioners, including Universal Motors, against the Union of India and other GST authorities. The specific tax periods and amounts in dispute are not detailed in this excerpt. The procedural history indicates that the High Court had previously passed orders in these CWPs, which the GST authorities are now seeking to have reviewed. The present excerpt is a brief order directing that the detailed order would be found in another case, RA-CW-506-2019 in CWP No.28203 of 2019, titled M/s Groupe SEB India Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the High Court, as indicated by the filing of Review Applications by the GST authorities, is whether there are any errors apparent on the face of the record in the previously passed orders in the Civil Writ Petitions. The specific legal questions and arguments presented by both the petitioner (GST authorities in their review applications) and the respondents (original petitioners in the CWPs) are not detailed in this excerpt. However, the context suggests the review applicants (GST authorities) likely argued that the High Court's previous decisions were incorrect and warranted reconsideration. The non-applicants (original petitioners) would have argued for the upholding of the High Court's prior orders. The specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules that formed the basis of the original petitions or the review applications are not explicitly stated.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
#1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Date of Decision:-10.01.2020 Universal Motors. ......Petitioner. Verus Union of India & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LALIT BATRA Present:- Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate & Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate for review applicants/ GST Authorities. Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amit Parsad, Advocate for the non applicant/Petitioner in RA-CW-557-2019 in CWP No.17676 of 2019. Mr. Surjeet Bhadu, Advocate & Mr. Veer Singh, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-515-2019 in CWP No.5983 of 2019, RA-CW-501-2019 in CWP No.5977 & RA-CW-513-2019 in CWP No.4248 of 2019. Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-514 of 2019 in CWP No.24809 of 2019 & RA-CW-500-2019 in CWP No.25303 of 2019. Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s) in RA-CW-506 of 2019 in CWP No.28203 of 2019 . Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Agnihotri, Advocate for non applicant(s)/ Petitioner(s
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.