Haryana Ayurvedic Drugs Manufacturers Association (Hadma) vs. Central Goods And Service Tax And Ors
Held
The Court noted that the petitioner had submitted a representation regarding the re-classification of AUS ingredient based sanitizers. The respondent, on instructions, submitted that this representation would be forwarded to the GST Council for appropriate consideration in accordance with law. The Court disposed of the writ petition with the hope that the GST Council would consider the matter at the earliest, given its importance. The Court did not decide on the merits of the classification dispute itself but directed the representation to be processed. No specific finding was given on whether the sanitizers were correctly classified or what the applicable GST rate should be; these issues were left for the GST Council's consideration.
Facts
The petitioner, Haryana Ayurvedic Drugs Manufacturers Association (HADMA), filed a writ petition challenging show cause notices issued by taxation authorities to manufacturers of "AUS ingredients-bases sanitizer". The authorities proposed to levy GST at 18% under HSN Code 3808-94, classifying the product as "alcohol based sanitizer". The petitioner contended that their sanitizers are Ayurvedic/Unani/Sidha (AUS) ingredient based and should attract GST at 12%. They had submitted a representation on July 27, 2020, to the respondents regarding this re-classification, but no action was taken. The respondents sought time to obtain instructions regarding the representation.
Key Issues
1. Whether the show cause notices issued by the respondent-authority, proposing to levy GST at 18% under HSN Code 3808-94 on "AUS ingredients-bases sanitizer" by misclassifying them as "alcohol based sanitizer", are legally sustainable? (Question of law and fact, turning on classification of goods under GST law). Petitioner's arguments: The petitioner argued that the impugned show cause notices were wrongly issued as the sanitizers manufactured by them are AUS ingredient based and distinct from alcohol-based sanitizers. They contended that their products fall under the 12% GST bracket, not the 18% proposed by the authorities. They relied on their representation dated July 27, 2020, to the respondents, highlighting the lack of action on it. Revenue's arguments: The revenue, through its counsel, submitted that the representation dated July 27, 2020, if already submitted, would be forwarded to the GST Council for appropriate consideration in accordance with law.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
#1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Date of Decision:-11.08.2020 Haryana Ayurvedic Drugs Manufacturers Assocication(HADMA). ......Petitioner. Versus Central Goods & Service Tax & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA Present:- Mr. Manik Sethi, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Senior Panel Counsel for Respondents. *** JASWANT SINGH, J. [The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in virtual court] Petitioner- Haryana Ayurvedic Drugs Manufacturers Association has preferred the instant writ petition seeking quashing of show cause notices (one of them being attached as P-12 dated 09.07.2020) issued by the Taxation authorities to the manufacturers of the “AUS ingredients- bases sanitizer” for depositing the GST at the Tariff Rate of 18% under the HS Coder 3808-94 instead of 12%. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the impugned show cause notices have been wrongly issued by the respondent-authority by misclassifying the same as “alcohol based sanitizer”, whereas
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.