Schlumberger Solutions Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner, Central GST And Ors
Facts
The petitioner, Schlumberger Solutions Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Principal Commissioner, Central GST, and others. The specific tax period(s) and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided judgment. The amount in dispute is also not stated. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is not recorded.
Held
The Court held that the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars or to avail any other alternate remedy as per law should be granted. The Court reasoned that the petitioner, after arguing for some time, sought this specific permission. Consequently, the Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the writ petition as withdrawn with the liberty granted. The pending Civil Miscellaneous Application, if any, was also disposed of as a consequence of the main petition being decided.
Key Issues
The Court had to decide whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner argued that they wished to withdraw the petition to file it afresh with better particulars or to pursue alternative remedies available under the law. The respondents' arguments, if any, are not recorded in the judgment. The core issue revolves around the Court's discretion to permit withdrawal of a writ petition under such circumstances.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12217-2021. Date of Decision:-16.07.2021. Schlumberger Solutions Private Limited .....Petitioner Versus Principal Commissioner, Central GST and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL **** Present: Mr. Amrinder Singh, Advocate and Ms. Priyanka Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. **** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars or to avail any other alternate remedy which may be available, as per law. Permission is granted. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Since the main writ petition has been decided, the pending Civil Miscellaneous Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 16, 2021. sandeep Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes / No Whether Reportable:- Yes / No. SANDEEP SETHI 2021.07.19 11:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.