M/S G K Traders, Delhi vs. State Of Punjab And Others
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. G K Traders, Delhi, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana challenging an order dated 31.01.2022 passed in Form GST MOV 11. The respondents were the State of Punjab and others. The specific tax period and the authority that passed the order were not explicitly detailed in the provided text, nor was the amount in dispute. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is not elaborated upon.
Held
The Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal in accordance with law. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No specific findings were made on the merits of the case or the validity of the impugned order, as the petition was withdrawn by the petitioner. The Court did not decide any substantive legal issues related to GST law.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether the impugned order dated 31.01.2022, passed in Form GST MOV 11, should be quashed. The petitioner sought this relief through a writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner's counsel, after arguing for some time, sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appeal in accordance with law. The State's arguments were not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3720-2022 Date of decision: 25.02.2022 M/s. G K Traders, Delhi .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Bhuwan Vats, Advocate for the petitioner. (Through Video Conferencing) ****
AJAY TEWARI, J (ORAL) The present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 31.01.2022 passed in form GST MOV 11 (Annexure P-1). After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appeal, in accordance with law. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE (PANKAJ JAIN) 25.02.2022 JUDGE Dinesh
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2022.03.03 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.