M/S A.B. Industries vs. Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate Ii And Another
Facts
The petitioner, M/s A.B. Industries, through its proprietor Mr. Ankush Bansal, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents are the Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Commissionerate-II, Chandigarh, and another authority. The judgment does not specify the tax period(s), the order or action under challenge, the authority that passed it, or the amount in dispute. The procedural history is also not detailed in the provided text.
Held
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, in its order of even date, has directed that detailed reasons for its decision will be provided separately in a connected case, CWP No.11860 of 2021. This short order does not contain the specific findings, reasoning, or ratio decidendi for CWP No.11867 of 2021. Consequently, no operative directions or relief granted to the petitioner are mentioned in this excerpt, nor are any issues expressly left undecided. The court's decision in this matter is contingent upon the detailed order to be issued in the companion writ petition.
Key Issues
The provided judgment is a short order referring to a separate, detailed order passed on the same date in a connected case, CWP No.11860 of 2021 titled 'M/s Shree Baba Exports through proprietor Jyotsna Agarwal vs. Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Commissionerate, Chd. and another'. Therefore, the specific issues decided in this particular case (CWP No.11867 of 2021) and the arguments presented by the petitioner and respondents are not recorded in this excerpt. The judgment does not frame any questions of law or mixed law and fact, nor does it mention any provisions of the GST Act or Rules that were discussed.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
211-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11867 of 2021 Date of decision : March 15, 2022 M/s A.B. Industries through proprietor Mr. Ankush Bansal ...Petitioner Versus Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Commissionerate-II, Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.K. Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. PANKAJ JAIN, J. For detailed reasons, see order of even date separately passed in CWP No.11860 of 2021 titled as 'M/s Shree Baba Exports through proprietor Jyotsna Agarwal vs. Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Commissionerate, Chd. and another'. (AJAY TEWARI) (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE JUDGE March 15, 2022
Dpr
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2022.03.16 16:15 I attest to the accuracy of this document
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.