M/S Bokan Rmc Faridabad vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors

CWP/8199/2020HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01042514202005 August 2022Bench: MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA,MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Bokan RMC, Faridabad, filed a writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging an order or action by the revenue authorities concerning GST. The matter was listed for hearing on November 26, 2020, and was adjourned pending the decision in SLP (C) Nos. 7425-7428 of 2020 before the Supreme Court. On July 22, 2022, the Supreme Court passed directions regarding the filing and verification of transitional credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms. Following these directions, the counsel for the petitioner stated that the instant petition was not being pressed.

Held

The Supreme Court, in SLP (C) Nos. 7425-7428 of 2020, issued comprehensive directions on July 22, 2022, concerning the availment of transitional credit. These directions mandated the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) to open a common portal for filing or revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms for a period of two months from September 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022. The Court clarified that any aggrieved registered assessee could file or revise their forms irrespective of prior writ petitions or decisions by the Information Technology Grievance Redressal Committee (ITGRC). The GSTN was directed to ensure no technical glitches occurred. Concerned officers were given 90 days thereafter to verify claims and pass orders on merits after affording an opportunity to the parties. The allowed transitional credit was to be reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger. In light of these Supreme Court directions, the counsel for the petitioner stated that the instant writ petition was not being pressed. The High Court noted that the Supreme Court's directions were to be meticulously complied with by the authorities.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to avail transitional credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms, considering the Supreme Court's directions in SLP (C) Nos. 7425-7428 of 2020? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner, by not pressing the petition, implicitly accepted the opportunity provided by the Supreme Court's directions to file or revise their transitional credit forms. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court's order dated July 22, 2022, which directed the opening of a common portal for filing these forms. Revenue's contention: The respondents, Union of India and others, were bound by the Supreme Court's directions. Their role was to facilitate the process as outlined by the apex court and verify the claims submitted by the petitioner within the stipulated timelines.

Sections Cited

TRAN-1, TRAN-2

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
CWP-8199-2020 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8199-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:05.08.2022 M/s Bokan RMC, Faridabad ....... Petitioner versus Union of India and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present: Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sharan Sethi, Sr.Standing Counsel for respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. Ms.Shruti Jain Goyal, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.4. *** TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. (ORAL) Matter had come up for preliminary hearing on 26.11.2020 and it had been directed to be listed after decision in SLP (C) Nos. 7425-7428 of 2020. Counsel for the parties have brought to our notice that in the aforementioned matter the Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed the following directions on 22.07.2022:- “Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Permission to file Special Leave Petition (s) is allowed.

Delay condoned.

Having heard learned Additional Solicitor General, learned counsel appearing for different States and learned counsel appearing for different private parties SUNITA NAGPAL 2022.08.08 16:13 I a

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.