Capital Gases vs. Union Of INDIA And Others

CWP/8453/2020HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01044180202005 August 2022Bench: MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA,MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Capital Gasess, filed a writ petition before the Punjab & Haryana High Court. The matter was listed for preliminary hearing and directed to be listed after the decision in specific Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, on July 22, 2022, passed directions concerning the filing and processing of transitional credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms. These directions included opening a common portal for two months, allowing aggrieved registered assessees to file or revise forms irrespective of prior writ petitions or ITGRC decisions, and ensuring no technical glitches. Concerned officers were given 90 days thereafter to verify claims and pass orders. The Supreme Court disposed of the SLPs with these directions.

Held

The Court noted that the Supreme Court, in SLP (C) Nos. 7425-7428 of 2020, had issued specific directions for opening a common portal for filing transitional credit forms (TRAN-1 and TRAN-2) for a period of two months (September 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022). These directions also mandated that aggrieved assessees could file or revise forms, regardless of whether they had filed a writ petition or if their case was decided by the ITGRC. The Supreme Court further directed GSTN to ensure no technical glitches and granted 90 days to concerned officers to verify claims and pass orders. The High Court observed that these directions were to be meticulously complied with by the authorities. Consequently, the counsel for the petitioner stated that they did not press the instant petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Supreme Court's directions in SLP (C) Nos. 7425-7428 of 2020, concerning the filing and processing of transitional credit through TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms, are to be complied with by the concerned authorities. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner's counsel, in light of the Supreme Court's order, did not press the instant petition. Respondents' contention: Not recorded, as the petitioner did not press the petition.

Sections Cited

TRAN-1, TRAN-2

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8453-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:05.08.2022 Capital Gasess ... Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN. Present: Mr. Chetan Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.K. Joshi, Sr. Standing counsel, for respondents No.1, 2 and 4. Mr. Ajay Jagga, Sr. Standing counsel for respondents No.3. ... TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. (ORAL). Matter had come up for preliminary hearing on 26.11.2020 and it had been directed to be listed after decision in SLP (C) Nos. 7425-7428 of 2020. Counsel for the parties have brought to our notice that in the aforementioned matter the Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed the following directions on 22.07.2022:- “Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Permission to file Special Leave Petition (s) is allowed.

Delay condoned.

Having heard learned Additional Solicitor General, learned counsel appearing for different States and learned counsel appearing for different private parties and having perused the record, we are of the view that it is just and proper to issue the following directions in

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.