Commissioner Of Central Excise vs. M/S Braun Textile Processor
Facts
The petitioner, Commissioner of Central Excise, Central Excise Commissionerate, Ludhiana, filed a Writ Petition (CWP-5015-2012) concerning M/s. Braun Textile Processor. The amount claimed in the petition was Rs. 66,33,715/-. The respondent is M/s. Braun Textile Processor, through its Managing Director. The proceedings were before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The judgment was delivered on February 12, 2024.
Held
The Court noted that the amount claimed in the Writ Petition was Rs. 66,33,715/-, which was within the exemption limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- as per the circular/instructions dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Excise and GST Department. Considering the low value of the amount in dispute, the Court found no purpose in prolonging the proceedings. Consequently, the Writ Petition was disposed of. However, the Court explicitly kept the question of law raised in the Writ Petition open for adjudication in the appropriate Court. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Writ Petition is maintainable given the amount in dispute in light of the exemption limit? (Question of law). The petitioner argued that the amount claimed (Rs. 66,33,715/-) was within the exemption limit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- as per circular/instructions dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Excise and GST Department. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
{2024:PHHC:019491-DB} 213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-5015-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.02.2024
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, F-BLOCK, RISHI NAGAR, LUDHIANA, PUNJAB
..…...Petitioner
V/s.
M/s. BRAUN TEXTILE PROCESSOR 851, INDUSTRIAL AREA-A, LUDHIANA, PUNJAB THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
….....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate and Ms. Shivani Sahni, Advocate for the petitioner.
*** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to the amount claimed in this Writ Petition being `66,33,715/- whereas the exemption is up to `1,00,00,000/- only in terms of the circular/instructions dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Excise and GST Department.
Keeping in view the low value of the amount, no purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings. In view thereof, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. However, the question of law raised in this Writ Petition is kep
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.