M/S Superlative Industires PVT. LTD. vs. Excise And Taxation Commissioner(GST), Haryana And Anr.

CWP/19631/2022HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01094251202202 April 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Superlative Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The respondents were the Excise and Taxation Commissioner (GST) Haryana and others. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the amount in dispute, are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed. The matter came before the Court for a decision.

Held

The Court accepted the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Writ Petition had become infructuous by the efflux of time. Consequently, the Court held that the petition was no longer maintainable or required to be decided on merits. The reasoning was solely based on the petitioner's submission that the purpose of the petition had been rendered moot by the passage of time. The Court did not delve into the substantive issues that might have formed the basis of the original writ petition. All pending applications associated with the writ petition were also disposed of.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the Writ Petition had become infructuous. The petitioner's counsel stated that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The Court needed to decide if this statement was sufficient to dispose of the petition. The petitioner argued that the matter was no longer alive or required adjudication. The respondents' contentions, if any, are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

260-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2024:PHHC:043576-DB CWP-19631-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.04.2024 M/s Superlative Products Pvt. Ltd.

. . . . Petitioner Vs. Excise and Taxation Commissioner (GST) Haryana and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA **** Present Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous by the efflux of time. The said statement is placed on record.

2.

Having regard to the said statement, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

3.

All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE April 02, 2024 Mohit goyal

1.

Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No 2. Whether reportable?

Yes/No MOHIT GOYAL 2024.04.03 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab &

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.