M/S Sparco Batteries PVT. LTD vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax, Panchkula Zone Haryana And Others
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Sparco Batteries Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The respondents were the Excise and Taxation Commissioner (GST) Haryana and others. The petitioner's counsel made a statement before the Court that the present Writ Petition had become infructuous by the efflux of time. This statement was placed on record. No specific tax period, order under challenge, authority that passed it, or amount in dispute was detailed in the provided judgment excerpt.
Held
The Court accepted the statement made by the petitioner's counsel that the Writ Petition had become infructuous by the efflux of time. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition on this ground. The reasoning is solely based on the petitioner's submission that the matter no longer requires adjudication. The ratio decidendi is that a writ petition rendered infructuous by the passage of time will be dismissed. All pending applications associated with the Writ Petition were also disposed of accordingly. No specific issue was expressly left undecided.
Key Issues
The Court had to decide whether the Writ Petition had become infructuous. The petitioner's counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The judgment does not record any arguments from the respondents.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
260-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2024:PHHC:043581-DB CWP-19633-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.04.2024 M/s Sparco Batteries Pvt. Ltd.
. . . . Petitioner Vs. Excise and Taxation Commissioner (GST) Haryana and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA **** Present Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous by the efflux of time. The said statement is placed on record.
Having regard to the said statement, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE April 02, 2024 Mohit goyal
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No 2. Whether reportable?
Yes/No MOHIT GOYAL 2024.04.03 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Harya
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.