Manish Agarwal And Another vs. State Of Punjab

CRA-S/2922/2024HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01104406202412 September 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT9 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The appellants, Manish Agarwal and another, are Directors of M/s Insta Chemi Private Limited. They are appealing an order dated 30.07.2024 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, which dismissed their application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The case arises from FIR No. 0044 dated 22.03.2024, registered at Police Station City Sunam, District Sangrur, Punjab, under Sections 302 and 120-B of the IPC, Section 61(1) of the Punjab and Excise Act, and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC and ST Act, 1989. The FIR was based on a complaint alleging that spurious liquor, purchased from Mangal Singh and supplied by others including Harmanpreet Singh, caused the deaths of several individuals, including the complainant's father. The appellants' company allegedly supplied denatured ethyl alcohol, branded "INSTASOL," to Harmanpreet Singh. The sales were documented with invoices, bills, and GST payments.

Held

The Court allowed the appeal and ordered the release of the appellants on bail. The Court noted that the only role attributed to the appellants was the supply of Ethanol to co-accused Harmanpreet Singh and Gurlal, who allegedly manufactured liquor using the product. However, there was no evidence to suggest that the appellants had conspired with Harmanpreet Singh and Gurlal in any manner. The Court further observed that the appellants were arrested on 18.04.2024, and a final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. had been presented. Crucially, the State failed to place on record any evidence indicating that the appellants were capable of influencing prosecution witnesses or that there was a likelihood of tampering with evidence by them. Given these circumstances, the Court concluded that the appeal deserved to be allowed. The appellants were ordered to be released on bail subject to furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. The Court did not expressly leave any issue undecided.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appellants, as Directors of M/s Insta Chemi Private Limited, are vicariously liable for the alleged misuse of denatured ethyl alcohol supplied by their company for the manufacture of spurious liquor, thereby attracting charges under Sections 302 and 120-B of the IPC and Section 61(1) of the Punjab and Excise Act, and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC and ST Act, 1989? Petitioner's Arguments: - The appellants are Directors with an oversight role, not directly involved in daily operations. - The sale of denatured ethyl alcohol (INSTASOL) was a routine business transaction, properly documented with invoices, bills, and GST payments, and there are no legal restrictions on such sales. - The company acted with transparency and complied with all legal requirements. - There was no notification or apprehension from regulatory authorities regarding the sale. - The police failed to collect evidence of intent to sell for illegal purposes. - The appellants had no direct conversation or meetings with other accused, and no evidence of call detail records or location charts shows connivance. - The main accused misused the product for illicit liquor manufacturing, and the appellants' involvement cannot be inferred. - No evidence suggests conspiracy or prior knowledge of the illicit plans. - Offences under Sections 468, 469, and 471 IPC are wrongly invoked as no documents were forged. - The sale was made in good faith without knowledge of the accused's illicit plans or the victims' consumption. - No offence under Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act is made out. Respondent's Arguments: - Several drums of Ethanol manufactured by the appellants' company were recovered from the main accused, Harmanpreet Singh. - Based on Harmanpreet Singh's disclosure statement, the appellants were arrayed as accused. - Chemicals used by Harmanpreet and Gurlal were purchased from the appellants' company for making spurious liquor. - The State counsel could not point out any evidence showing the appellants' knowledge that their product would be used for illicit liquor manufacturing.

Sections Cited

Section 439 Cr.P.C., Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act) 1989, Sections 302, 120-B, 468, 469, 471, 328, 201 IPC, Section 61(1), 61A/1/14, 3(2)(V) of the Excise Act, Section 3(2)(V) of the SC and ST Act, 1989, Section 173 Cr.P.C.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 242/2 CRA-S-2922-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:12.09.2024 Manish Agarwal and another

...Appellants Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present : Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate Mr. Parveej Chagh, Advocate Mr. Amritpal Singh Mann, Advocate Mr. Dhruv Trehan, Advocate and Mr. Kashish Sahni, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Deepinder Singh Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab. N.S.SHEKHAWAT

, J.

1.

The appellants have preferred the present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act) 1989, (hereinafter to be referred as the SC/ST Act) against the impugned order dated 30.07.2024 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, whereby, the application filed by the appellants under Section 439 Cr.P.C., was ordered to be dismissed in a case arising out of the FIR No. 0044 dated 22.03.2024 under Sections 302 and 120-B of IPC and Section 61(1) of the Punjab and Excise Act (offences under Sections 468/469/471/328/201 of IPC and Section 61A/1/14 of the Excise Act, MAMTA 2024.09.18 17:04 I att

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.