Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Surat vs. Chetan Balvantrai Chauhan

TAXAP/965/2017HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24057217201720 February 2020Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that the Tax Appeal could be disposed of on the ground of low tax effect, as stated by the Revenue's counsel. Consequently, the Tax Appeal was disposed of as not pressed on this ground. The Court explicitly clarified that it had not gone into the merits of the issue raised in the Tax Appeal. Therefore, no specific finding was made on any substantive GST or Central Excise law, nor was any principle established for future citation. The operative direction was to dispose of the appeal on the stated ground.

Facts

The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Surat, filed a Tax Appeal (C/TAXAP/965/2017) before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad against Chetan Balvantrai Chauhan. The appeal was filed by the Revenue. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to this appeal is not detailed, other than the filing of the Tax Appeal itself. The Revenue's counsel made a statement before the Court.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether to proceed with the hearing of the Tax Appeal. The Revenue, through its counsel, made a statement regarding the low tax effect of the appeal. The petitioner (Revenue) argued that the appeal could be disposed of on the ground of low tax effect. The respondent (Opponent) did not appear to argue their case, as indicated by 'RULE SERVED'. The Court did not delve into the merits of the issues raised in the Tax Appeal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/TAXAP/965/2017 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 965 of 2017 ========================================================== COMMISSIONER OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT Versus CHETAN BALVANTRAI CHAUHAN ========================================================== Appearance: MR ANKIT SHAH(6371) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED(64) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 20/02/2020

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)

1.

Mr. Ankit Shah the learned senior standing counsel appearing for the Revenue makes a statement that this Tax Appeal can be disposed of on the ground of low tax effect.

2.

In the wake of such statement being made, the Tax Appeal is disposed of as not pressed on the ground of low tax effect.

3.

We clarify that, we have not gone into the merits of the issue raised in this Tax Appeal. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) KUMAR ALOK

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.