M/S Kapson Iron And Steel LLP vs. State Of Gujarat
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Kapson Iron and Steel LLP, filed a writ-application before the High Court of Gujarat challenging an order in Form GST DRC-07 dated 29.12.2021, passed by the Proper Officer. The petitioner's grievance included the lack of a personal hearing before the impugned order was passed. The respondent was the State of Gujarat. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute were not explicitly recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ-application was not detailed, other than the issuance of the impugned order.
Held
The Court held that the impugned order passed by the Proper Officer in Form GST DRC-07 dated 29.12.2021 is an appealable order under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. Consequently, the Court declined to entertain the writ-application on the ground that the petitioner has a statutory remedy available in the form of an appeal. The Court directed that all contentions raised by the petitioner, particularly the grievance regarding the lack of a personal hearing, may be canvassed before the appellate authority. The appellate authority was instructed to consider this aspect and dispose of the appeal on its own merits within two months from the date of registration. The Court explicitly stated that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Key Issues
1. Whether the writ-applicant has an alternative statutory remedy available against the impugned order passed by the Proper Officer under the GST Act, 2017, and if so, whether the writ-application is maintainable. Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner approached the High Court by way of a writ-application, implying a challenge to the order. The specific arguments regarding the merits of the case, including the denial of personal hearing, were raised in the writ-application. Revenue's Contention: The State of Gujarat, represented by the Government Pleader, did not explicitly record arguments in the judgment. However, the Court's decision implies that the revenue would have pointed to the availability of an appeal.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
The impugned passed by the Proper Officer in Form GST DRC-07 dated 29.12.2021 is an appealable order under Section-107 of the Act, 2017. We decline to entertain this writ-application only on the ground that the writ-applicant has a statutory remedy available in the form of an appeal.
All the contentions raised in the present writ-application may be canvassed before the appellate authority and
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.