M/S. Screenotex Engineers PVT LTD Through Its Director Hemantkumar Maneklal Patel vs. Upendrasingh Yadav ,Commissioner Of GST

MCA/1310/2022HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24072555202214 December 2022Bench: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Screenotex Engineers Pvt Ltd, through its Director Hemantkumar Maneklal Patel, filed a Misc. Civil Application (MCA) No. 1310 of 2022 before the Gujarat High Court. This application was filed in connection with Special Civil Application (SCA) No. 10367 of 2020. The respondents were Upendrasingh Yadav, Commissioner of GST, and other authorities. The specific order or action under challenge and the tax period(s) are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history indicates that the MCA was filed subsequent to the SCA.

Held

The Court noted the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent authorities that the order had been complied with. In light of this statement and the instructions received, the learned advocate appearing for the applicants (petitioner) stated that they did not press the present Misc. Civil Application. Consequently, the Court disposed of the application as not pressed. The Court did not delve into the merits of the original dispute or the specific provisions of GST law. The ratio decidendi is that if the respondent authorities confirm compliance with a court order, and the petitioner consequently withdraws their application, the matter is closed on that basis.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the order passed in the connected Special Civil Application No. 10367 of 2020 had been complied with by the respondent authorities. The petitioner's counsel, Ms. Manila Poonia, appearing for Mr. D.K. Trivedi, stated that the application was not pressed. The respondent authorities, represented by Mr. Sahil Trivedi, learned Assistant Government Pleader, stated that the order had been complied with. Therefore, the Court did not have to decide any substantive legal questions regarding GST provisions or the merits of the original dispute. The only question was the status of compliance with a previous court order.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/MCA/1310/2022 ORDER DATED: 14/12/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1310 of 2022 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10367 of 2020 ========================================================== M/S. SCREENOTEX ENGINEERS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR HEMANTKUMAR MANEKLAL PATEL Versus UPENDRASINGH YADAV ,COMMISSIONER OF GST ========================================================== Appearance: MS. MANILA POONIA FOR MR D K TRIVEDI(5283) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2 for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI and HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE Date : 14/12/2022

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.J.DESAI) Mr. Sahil Trivedi, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent authorities states that the order is complied with.

In view of the above statement, under the instructions, learned advocate appearing for the applicants does not press this application. Hence, present Misc. Civil Application stands disposed of as not pressed. (A.J.DE

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.