Arumugam Mayan Perumal vs. Assistant Commissioner(St)
Facts
The petitioner, Arumugam Mayan Perumal, filed a writ petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 30.05.2025, passed by the Assistant Commissioner(ST), Karur, which cancelled the petitioner's GST registration effective from 08.04.2025. The petitioner sought to quash this order and direct the respondent to restore the GST registration. Both the petitioner's counsel and the respondent's counsel agreed that the issue was covered by a previous decision of the same Court.
Held
The Court held that the issue was squarely covered by its previous decision in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center Vs. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) and others. Consequently, the impugned order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration was set aside. The respondent was directed to restore the petitioner's GST registration, subject to the petitioner complying with the conditions stipulated in the Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center judgment. These conditions include filing pending returns, paying defaulted tax along with interest, penalties, and fees, and making payments in cash without utilizing Input Tax Credit (ITC) until it is scrutinized and approved. The Court also directed the respondent to take steps to enable the petitioner to file returns and pay dues, and to revive the registration forthwith upon compliance. The respondent was given thirty days to complete this exercise. No costs were awarded.
Key Issues
1. Whether the cancellation of GST registration by the respondent authority is valid, considering the principles laid down in the case of Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center Vs. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) and others? (Question of law). Petitioner's contention: The petitioner contended that the issue is squarely covered by the decision in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center, and therefore, the impugned order should be set aside and registration restored. Respondent's contention: The respondent agreed that the issue is covered by the Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center case and did not present any opposing arguments.
Sections Cited
FORM GST REG 19
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
This Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Taxes) for the respondent.
The petitioner has challenged the im
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.