M/S Surbhi Enterprises vs. Deputy Commissioner State Tax Range

WPMB/733/2026HC UttarakhandGSTCNR UKHC01015744202623 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

M/s Surbhi Enterprises, the petitioner, filed a writ petition before the Uttarakhand High Court. The petitioner sought a direction for the respondent, the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, to decide their rectification application. The application was filed under Section 161 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The respondent's counsel did not object to the petitioner's prayer for a time-bound decision on the rectification application.

Held

The Court held that the Proper Officer should decide the rectification application filed by the petitioner within four weeks from the date of communication of the order. This decision was based on the petitioner's prayer and the respondent's lack of objection. The Court's reasoning was that it was appropriate to direct a time-bound disposal of the pending application. The ratio decidendi is that High Courts can direct statutory authorities to decide applications within a reasonable time when no objection is raised by the revenue. The operative direction was to decide the rectification application within four weeks.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Court should direct the respondent to decide the petitioner's rectification application filed under Section 161 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a stipulated time frame? The petitioner argued that a prompt decision on their rectification application was necessary. The respondent did not contest this prayer.

Sections Cited

Section 161

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
UKHC010157442026 2026:UHC:8607-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 733 OF 2026 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2026 M/s Surbhi Enterprises …… Petitioner Versus Dy. Commissioner, State Tax …… Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel Counsel for the respondent : Ms. Puja Banga, learned Standing Counsel for the State through VC The Court made the following:

JUDGMENT: (per Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

1)

Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset confines his prayer to relief No. (i), which is for a direction to the respondent to decide the rectification application of the petitioner filed under Section 161 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, within a time bound period. 2)

Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel for the Revenue has no objection to the same. 1

UKHC010157442026

2026:UHC:8607-DB 3)

Accordingly, the writ petitio

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Uttarakhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.