Mohit Deora vs. Union Of INDIA Through Intelligence Officer
Facts
The petitioner, Mohit Deora, a resident of Kolkata, West Bengal, filed an anticipatory bail application (A.B.A. No. 2117 of 2025) before the Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi. The application was directed against the Union of India, represented by the Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Regional Unit, Jamshedpur. The specific order or action under challenge and the tax period(s) involved are not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the anticipatory bail application.
Held
The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application. The reason for dismissal was the non-appearance of the petitioner or their counsel on repeated calls. Consequently, the application was dismissed for non-prosecution. No findings were made on the merits of the case or the entitlement to anticipatory bail, as the matter was decided on procedural grounds. The operative direction was the dismissal of the application.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with proceedings initiated by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence. The petitioner's contentions are not recorded as no one appeared on their behalf. The revenue's contentions are also not recorded.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2025:JHHC:18677 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2117 of 2025 ------ Mohit Deora, aged about 30 years, son of Shiva Kumar Deora, resident of Swarnamani Complex, Tower Zarima FI 2ZB, 33A Canal Circular Road, Near Bengal Chemical, Kankurgachi, P.O., Kankurgachi, P.S. Kankurgachi, District Kolkata, (West Bengal)
… … Petitioner Versus Union of India through Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Regional Unit, Jamshedpur, 2nd/3rd Floor, Shaurya Trade Centre, 159, Dhalbhum Road, Sakchi, P.O.- Sakchi, P.S. Sakchi, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
… … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) :
For the UOI : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Senior Standing Counsel
Mr. Anurag Vijay, Junior Standing Counsel ----- 04/ 10.07.2025
No-one appears on behalf of the petitioner even on repeated calls.
Thus, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Sandeep. Cp3
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.