M/S Ampl - Nkas (Jv) Is Represented Through M/S Ambey Mining PVT LTD vs. The State Of Jharkhand

WPC/4707/2024HC JharkhandGSTCNR JHHC01026790202411 September 2024Bench: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

M/s. AMPL-NKAS (JV), a joint venture, filed a writ petition before the Jharkhand High Court. The petitioner sought to quash an Adjudication Order dated June 22, 2024, and a Show Cause Notice dated May 4, 2024, issued by the State Tax Officer (Respondent No. 3). These orders pertained to the period April 2019 to March 2020 and were passed under Section 74(9) and Section 74(1) of the CGST/JGST Act, 2017, respectively. The petitioner also sought a stay on the Adjudication Order and a direction to prevent coercive measures. The respondents raised the issue of the maintainability of the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy.

Held

The Court held that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternative remedy. The Court reasoned that the dispute involved factual aspects concerning the assessment for the financial year in question, which are best examined by the appellate authority. Therefore, the Court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to prefer an appeal within two weeks. The appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal within four weeks of its receipt. The Court did not decide on the merits of the Adjudication Order or the Show Cause Notice.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petition is maintainable in light of the availability of an alternative remedy under the GST Act? (Question of law) The petitioner argued that the Adjudication Order and Show Cause Notice were flawed due to the authority's failure to appreciate the factual aspects correctly. The respondents contended that the writ petition should be dismissed on the grounds of alternative remedy being available. The Court was asked to decide if the writ petition should be entertained despite the statutory appeal process.

Sections Cited

Section 74(9), Section 74(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Page 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(T) No. 4707 of 2024 ----- M/s. AMPL-NKAS (JV), are a joint venture enterprise having its head office At – 8, A.J.C. Bose Road, Circular Court 9th Floor, Unit – 92, P.O. – Circus Avenue, P.S. Shakespeare Sarani, Dist. Kolkata, PIN Code – 700017, in the State of West Bengal and principal place of business in the State of Jharkhand, At Near Hired Mobile Crusher Site, P.S. – Jogta, Sijua, Dhanbad, Jharkhand – 828121, is represented through M/s Ambey Mining Pvt. Ltd., Joint Venture Partner, through its Manager Sri Om Prakash Pareek, S/o Sri Radhe Shyam Pareek, aged about 62 years, resident of At – 48, Subhash Sangha Square, Subhas Pally, Benachity, Durgapur, P.O. – Benachity, P.S. – Aurabindo Dist. – Paschim Barddhaman, West Bengal – 713213, who is a citizen of India

… … … Appellant Versus

1.

The State of Jharkhand

2.

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Commercial Tax Department, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. – Dhurwa, Ranchi – 834004

3.

State Tax Officer, Katras Circle, Katras, Commercial Tax Department, P.O. and P.S. – Dhanbad, Dist. – Dhanbad, Jharkhand

4.

Deputy Commissioner of Stat

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Jharkhand High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.