M/S Mayyank Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA

SCA/4290/2021HC GujaratGSTCNR GJHC24011330202123 June 2021Bench: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI,HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Mayyank Enterprises, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court challenging an action by the revenue authorities. The petitioner sought to lift the attachment of its bank account and also raised concerns regarding the investigation proceedings initiated by both Central and State authorities concerning the same subject matter. The petitioner's advocate argued at length before the Court. The tax period(s) and the specific amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history involves the filing of the writ petition before the High Court.

Held

The Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the case. Instead, it permitted the petitioner's advocate to withdraw the petition. The Court directed that the representation made by the petitioner to respondent No. 6 (an authority not explicitly identified but implied to be the relevant authority for the representation) should be decided expeditiously, preferably within three weeks from the date of receipt. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn subject to this direction. The specific issue regarding the lifting of attachment and the applicability of Section 6(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, was not decided on merits.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to have its bank account attachment lifted, considering the ongoing investigations by both Central and State authorities for the same subject matter, and in light of Section 6(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that the initiation of investigation proceedings by both Central and State authorities for the same subject matter is problematic and sought relief for the attachment of its bank account. The petitioner's advocate specifically referred to Section 6(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, implying a potential issue with dual investigations. Revenue's contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the respondents (Union of India and State authorities).

Sections Cited

Section 6(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
C/SCA/4290/2021 ORDER DATED: 23/06/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4290 of 2021 ================================================================ M/S MAYYANK ENTERPRISES Versus UNION OF INDIA ================================================================ Appearance: MR AVINASH PODDAR(9761) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR DEVANG VYAS(2794) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,4,6,7 MS DHWANI TRIPATHI, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 3,5,8 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI and HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI Date : 23/06/2021

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI)

1.

After arguing at length, learned Advocate Mr. Avinash Poddar for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with a view to make a representation to the respondent No.6 with regard to the prayers contained in the present petition, more particularly, for lifting the attachment of the bank account of the petitioner and also with regard to the

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gujarat High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.