Nanu Engineering Private LTD Represented By Director Sankalp Sandesh Naik vs. Tajdin Javerbhai Mavany (Since Dec.) Rep. Through His Lrs
Original PDF →Facts
The Applicant, Nanu Engineering Private Ltd, filed a Misc. Civil Application seeking directions from the Bombay High Court at Goa. The application requested the Registry to provide details of rent deposited by the Appellant in pursuance of an interim order dated July 23, 2014, in Civil Application No. 14 of 2013. Additionally, the Applicant sought particulars of the interest component within the total amount of Rs. 65,39,627/- paid to them. The Respondents' counsel had no objection to the necessary directions being issued.
Held
The Court allowed the application in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). It directed the Registry to provide the particulars of the rent amount deposited by the Appellant and the interest component within the total sum paid to the Applicant. The Court further granted liberty to the Applicant to raise a GST invoice against the Appellant. The reasoning appears to be that providing these particulars is necessary for the Applicant to correctly comply with GST regulations and issue an appropriate invoice for the transaction, which involved rent and interest. The application was disposed of with these directions.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Court should direct the Registry to provide particulars of the rent amount deposited by the Appellant and the interest component within the total sum paid to the Applicant, as per the interim order dated July 23, 2014. Arguments: Petitioner/Applicant: The Applicant sought specific details regarding the rent deposit and the interest component to facilitate the issuance of a GST invoice. The application was filed to obtain necessary information for compliance and to correctly account for the transaction under GST law. Revenue/State: The judgment records no specific arguments from the Revenue or State. However, the Respondents' Advocate indicated no objection to the directions being given.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
906 MCA 540 2026 Amrut IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.7 OF 2013 NANU ENGINEERING PRIVATE LTD REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR SANKALP SANDESH NAIK ... APPLICANT Versus TAJDIN JAVERBHAI MAVANY (SINCE DEC.) REP. THROUGH HIS LRS ... RESPONDENTS Ms Neha Kholkar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms S. Kenny, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED :- 24th September, 2026 P.C.:
The present application is filed seeking directions against Registry to provide particulars of amount of rent deposited by Appellant in pursuance of interim order dated 23rd July 2014 in Civil Application No.14 of 2013. Applicant further seeks direction to furnish particulars of interest component in the total amount of Rs.65,39,627/- paid to the Applicant.
Learned Advocate appearing for Respondents has no objection if necessary directions are given to Registry. In that view of matter, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and 24th September, 2026 2026:BHC-GOA:1897
906 MCA 540 2026 (b). Applicant is at liberty to raise GST invoice against the Appellant.
Application stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. 24th September, 2026 Signed by: TARI AMRUT NAGESH Designation: Private Secretary Date: 24/09/2026 13:52:31
Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.