Dheeraj Harish Thakkar vs. The State Of Maharashtra,Finance Dept. Thru Commissioner Of State Tax And Anr

WP/8828/2019HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM01013499201927 November 2019Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN JAMDAR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.S. SANKLECHA2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The Petitioner, Dheeraj Harish Thakkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated August 3, 2018, passed by the respondent revenue authorities. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history indicates that the Petitioner approached the High Court directly through a writ petition.

Held

The Court allowed the Petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Petitioner was granted liberty to approach the appellate authority under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court further directed that if the Petitioner files an appeal along with an application for condonation of delay, the appellate authority should consider the fact that the Petitioner was pursuing a challenge to the impugned order before the High Court when deciding the condonation application. The Court did not decide any substantive issues related to the GST assessment or the impugned order itself.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The Petitioner, through their counsel, sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the appellate authority. The respondents, represented by Special Counsel and a panel counsel, did not object to this request.

Sections Cited

Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 22 WP 8828-2019.doc Mr.V.A.Sonpal, Special Counsel a/w Ms.Shruti D.Vyas, ‘B’-Panel Counsel, for Respondents. CORAM : M.S.SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ. Date : 27 November 2019. P.C. :

Mr.Lad, learned Counsel appearing in support of the Petition on instructions seeks to withdraw this Petition with liberty to approach the appellate Authority under the provisions of Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Liberty as sought for granted.

2.

In case the Petitioner does file an appeal to the appellate Authority along with an application for condonation of delay after complying with all the other statutory requirements, then the 2 22 WP 8828-2019.doc appellate Authority would take up the application for condonati

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.