Naresh T Jain vs. The State Of Maharashtra

BA/5152/2024HC BombayGSTCNR HCBM01060516202425 February 2025Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV15 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

Two bail applications were filed by Anil O. Khandelwal (Chief Financial Officer of Cox and Kings Limited - CKL) and Naresh Tikamchand Jain (Internal Auditor of CKL) in connection with C.R. No.30 of 2020, registered by the Economic Offences Wing for offences under Sections 406, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477A read with 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants are co-accused in a case concerning the default in repayment of a loan of Rs. 174.32 crores to Kotak Mahindra Bank, advanced as working capital between November 2012 and August 2019. The prosecution alleges falsification of accounts and diversion of funds. Anil O. Khandelwal has been incarcerated since December 28, 2020, and Naresh Tikamchand Jain since March 17, 2021. Charge-sheet has been filed.

Held

The Court allowed both bail applications. The Court noted that the applicants, Anil O. Khandelwal (CFO) and Naresh Tikamchand Jain (Internal Auditor), were seeking bail after prolonged incarceration. It was highlighted that the main accused, Ajay Ajit Peter Kerkar, had been granted bail by the Supreme Court, and Anil O. Khandelwal had also been granted bail by this Court in a related matter. Furthermore, both applicants had secured bail from the PMLA Special Court on grounds of delay in trial commencement and their long period of custody. The Court observed that the Complainant Bank had advanced substantial amounts over a long period (7 years) and questioned whether adequate due diligence was performed, especially given the allegations of falsified accounts. While acknowledging that the complicity of the accused would be determined at trial, the Court found that the applicants had made out a case for bail based on their long incarceration and the aforementioned orders. The applicants were directed to be released on bail with specific terms and conditions, including furnishing bail bonds, reporting to the Investigating Officer, cooperating with the trial, not leaving the state without permission, and surrendering their passports.

Key Issues

1. Whether the applicants are entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, considering their period of incarceration and the bail granted to the main accused and co-accused. Petitioner's Arguments: - The main accused, Ajay Ajit Peter Kerkar, was granted bail by the Supreme Court on August 29, 2024. - Anil O. Khandelwal was previously granted bail by this Court on August 13, 2024, in a related matter with similar allegations. - Both applicants have been granted bail by the PMLA Special Court on April 30, 2024, on grounds of delay in trial commencement and long incarceration. - The applicants claim parity with the main accused and co-accused who have been enlarged on bail. - They have fully cooperated with the investigation. Respondent's Arguments: - The judgment records no specific arguments from the State.

Sections Cited

Section 439

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

902(i).BA.4955.2024+.doc Ajay

IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURI ICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURI ICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION

NO. 4955 OF 2024

Anil O. Khandelwal .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION

NO. 5152 OF 2024

Naresh Tikamchand Jain .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................  Mr. Ashok Mundargi, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Subir Sarkar i./by Ms. Dhruti Chheda and Mr. Ankit Pandey, Advocates for Applicant in BA No. 4955 of 2024.  Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w. Ms. Sayee Sawant, Mr. Shaunak Sawant, Mr. Yash Fadtare, Mr. Ishan Paradkar, Mr. Samay Pawar i/by Vidhii Partners for Applicant in BA No. 5152 of 2024.  Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent – State in both matters.  WPI Ms. Ghadge, for EOW present. ......…........... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 25, 2025. P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Mundargi, learned Senior Advocate for Applicant in Bail Application No.4955 of 2024; Mr. Joshi, learned Advocate for Applicant in Bail Application No.5152 of 202

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Bombay High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.