Mohammed Sadiq vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER
In this petition, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:-
“ a) Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ directing the Respondent No.1 to not take any coercive action as against the Petitioner and permit the Petitioner to submit necessary details in support of the GSRT 3B filed by the Petitioner in response to the summons dated: 17.02.2024 Ref No.M.A.290224094881K.
b) And pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the concerned respondents have issued summons to the petitioner who are appearing before the respondents and are ready to co- operate with the proceedings initiated by the respondents. It is submitted that necessary directions may be issued to the respondents to conduct and complete the proceedings in accordance with law after complying with the principles of natural justice and providing sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.
Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that respondents would continue the proceedings in accordance with law and comply with the principles of natural justice and take appropriate steps and pass appropriate orders in NC: 2024:KHC:9673 WP No. 7351 of 2024
accordance with law after providing sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits / demerits of the rival contentions, I deem it just and proper to dispose of this petition by directing the concerned respondents to continue the proceedings initiated against the petitioner and take appropriate steps/pass appropriate orders in accordance with law by complying with the principles of natural justice and also by providing sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner to contest the proceedings. Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit pleadings, documents etc., which shall be considered by concerned respondents who shall proceed further in accordance with law. Petitioner is directed to appear before the respondents as and when they are summoned/required by them.
Subject to the aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. JUDGE
Srl.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.