M/S Vodafone Mobile Services LTD vs. Commissioner Of Service Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
DATED 05.02.2018 PASSED IN FINAL ORDER NO. 20060/2018 IN APPEAL NO. ST/1333/2011-DB, PRAYING TO I. ADMIT THE APPEAL FOR CONSIDERATION AND II. DECIDE THE QUESTIONS OF LAW AS FRAMED HEREIN ABOVE IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANTS AND CONSEQUENTLY AND ETC.,
THIS CEA, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: VANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA NC: 2025:KHC:4197-DB CEA No. 32 of 2018
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT)
The Substantial Questions of Law framed in the appeal are to be answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue in view of the decision of Apex Court in M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD VS. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE, (2024) 132 GSTR 404. In the above circumstances, this appeal is allowed; impugned order of the Tribunal is set at naught, costs having been made easy. (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE cbc List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.