BharatTaxGST

Tvl. Sri Vignesh Traders vs. The State Tax Officer - 2 (Intelligence)

Original PDF →
WP(MD)/7508/2026HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01035811202623 March 2026Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY5 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
W.P.(MD) No.7508 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD) No.7508 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD) No.6156 of 2026 Tvl.Sri Vignesh Traders Rep. by its Proprietor Hariharan Sri Hari, S/o.Hariharan, No.10, Aswini Street, Duraisamy Nagar, Bye-Pass Road Madurai - 625 010. ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer - 2 (Intelligence), Data Analytics Unit, Madurai - 625 020. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned assessment order on the file of the respondent vide GSTIN 33CPIPS5949K1Z6/2022-23 and summary order bearing reference No.ZD3309250195863 dated 02.09.2025 and quash the same as illegal and devoid of merits and direct the respondent to redo the assessment proceedings for the year 2022-23. For Petitioner : Mr.Raja.Karthikeyan _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.7508 of 2026 For Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 02.09.2025. 2. Upon perusal of the impugned order, it can be seen that, when there were mismatches between GSTR-3B and trading of pipes and between GSTR-3B/GSTR-1 and GSTR-7, non-payment of tax towards hire charges paid to the lorry owners and outstanding sundry creditors, along with a proposal for levy of interest and penalty on the defaulted tax, the petitioner did not avail the opportunity when the show cause notice was uploaded. Accordingly, the impugned order came to be passed ex parte.

3.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the show cause notice and the personal hearing notices were uploaded on the portal, the petitioner was not aware of the same and that the assessing authority has passed the impugned order without considering the documents available on the web portal of the department. _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.

This Court, taking into account the said submission and considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the entire tax amount has been realised, is of the view that one more opportunity can be granted to the petitioner. This Writ Petition is therefore allowed on the following terms: (i) The impugned order dated 02.09.2025 shall stand set aside and the matter shall stand remitted back to the file of the respondent. (ii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent without fail and file such reply and produce such documentary evidence in support of its claim. (iii) The respondent authority shall pass fresh orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. (iv) No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

23.03.

2026 JEN Neutral Citation : No _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To The State Tax Officer - 2 (Intelligence), Data Analytics Unit, Madurai - 625 020. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

JEN

23.03.

2026 (3/4) _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.