Tvl Sudha Constructions vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Before: and
This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 20.12.2024 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Standing Counsel for the respondent.
By the impugned order, the assessment was made ex-parte because the petitioner did not utilise the opportunities provided. The discrepancies and grounds on which, the assessment was issued, the dealer’s explanation on merits, and the reasons for not participating in the assessment proceedings are summarised briefly and presented in a table below: 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Discrepancies found/Grounds on which the Order is passed Explanation offered by the Assessee on merits Explanation for not availing the opportunity The discrepancies were found in the reversal of ITC towards variation between GSTR 2A and 3B and the reversal of ITC purchased from the cancelled dealers. All the notices and assessment orders were uploaded in the departmental web portal by the respondent. Hence, behind my back the assessment was made. Ex-parte order All the notice and order were served in the web portal. The petitioner was not noticed the show cause notice in the web portal.
Considering the nature of the discrepancies noted, the explanation provided by the assessee and the reason given before this Court for not availing the opportunity, I believe that an opportunity can be granted to the assessee to present their submissions and produce the relevant supporting documents before the respondent assessing officer. This Court has been extending such opportunities on equitable grounds; however, under appropriate conditions. Therefore, an opportunity is granted to the petitioner assessee.
Since it is stated that more than 50% has been recovered in the matter, no additional condition is imposed. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms: 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (i) The impugned order dated 20.12.2024 shall stand set aside, and the matter shall stand remanded back to the file of the respondent; (ii) Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of this order, the assessee shall appear before the respondent without fail and submit their reply and documents in support of their claim, and it is for the respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law; (iii) Since the impugned order of assessment is set aside, any attachment of the bank account made pursuant to the impugned order shall stand raised; (iv) No costs. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
2026 sji NCC: Yes/No 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To The Deputy State Tax Officer (ST), The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, O/o. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)-1, Sivakasi-1 Assessment Circle, Virudhunagar District. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. sji
2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.