Tvl. Sri Kaleeswari Electricals And Pipes vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer / Commercial Tax Officer

Original PDF →
WP(MD)/17115/2026HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01078563202622 June 2026Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY6 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Before: and

This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 29.11.2025 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Standing Counsel for the respondent.

3.

By the impugned order, the assessment was made ex-parte because the petitioner did not utilise the opportunities provided. The discrepancies and grounds on which the assessment order was issued, the dealer’s explanation on merits, and the reasons for not participating in the assessment proceedings are summarised briefly and presented in a table below: 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Discrepancies found/Grounds on which the Order is passed Explanation offered by the Assessee on merits Explanation for not availing the opportunity Respondent is ex-facie arbitrary, illegal. Proper officer reverse the ITC. Mismatch of GSTR-3B & 2A. Bonafide purchaser were not reporting of transaction in GSTR-1. Hence as per Section 16, we eligible to claim of ITC. Ex-parte order. All the notices and order were served in the web portal, petitioner was not noticed the show cause notice in the web portal.

4.

Considering the nature of the discrepancies noted, the explanation provided by the assessee and the reason given before this Court for not availing the opportunity, I believe that an opportunity can be granted to the assessee to present their submissions and produce the relevant supporting documents before the respondent assessing officer. This Court has been extending such opportunities on equitable grounds; however, under appropriate conditions. Therefore, an opportunity is granted to the petitioner assessee.

5.

Since it is stated that 45% of the disputed tax amount has already been recovered, no additional condition is imposed. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms: 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (i) The impugned order dated 29.11.2025 shall stand set aside, and the matter shall stand remanded back to the file of the respondent; (ii) Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of this order, the assessee shall appear before the respondent without fail and submit their reply and documents in support of their claim, and it is for the respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law, without waiting for a certified copy of the order; (iii) Since the impugned order of assessment is set aside, any attachment of the bank account made pursuant to the impugned order shall stand raised; (iv) No costs. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22.06.2026 sji NCC: Yes/No To The Deputy State Tax Officer/Commercial Tax Officer, Sivagangai Assessment Circle, Virudhunagar District. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. sji

22.06.

2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.