Mehta Contruction Company vs. Deputy Commissioner Of State Tax SGST And Ors

Original PDF →
CWP/19821/2026HC Punjab and HaryanaGSTCNR PHHC01104535202606 July 2026Bench: JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED),MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed as withdrawn

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Mehta Construction Company, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The respondents were the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (SGST) and others. The specific tax period(s) and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not stated. The procedural history indicates that the petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars and details. The Court considered this request.

Held

The Court held that the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's counsel's submission that they wished to withdraw the current petition to file a more detailed and particularized one. The operative direction was the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, with the explicit grant of liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. Any pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether to allow the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The petitioner argued for withdrawal with liberty to refile, citing the need to provide better particulars and details in their petition. The respondents' arguments are not recorded in the provided text. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were explicitly discussed in relation to this procedural request.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

157

I

M/s Mehta Co Deputy Comm

CORAM: H

H

Present: M

M

ASHWANI K

1.

A prayer to with better particul

2.

D

3.

A

06.07.

2026 rajesh

1 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIGA CWP-1 HON’BLE THE ACTING CHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROH Ms. Esh Gupta, Advocate for the Mr. Sourabh Goel, Addl. AG, Ha

***

KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Or At the outset, learned counsel fo hdraw the instant petition with l lars and details. Dismissed as withdrawn with the All pending misc. application(s),

(AS

A

1.

Whether speaking/reasoned?

2.

Whether reportable?

NJAB AND HARYANA ARH 19821-2026 (O&M) f Decision: 06.07.2026

…Petitioner nd others …Respondents IEF JUSTICE HIT KAPOOR e petitioner. aryana. ral) r the petitioner comes up with a liberty to file fresh petition with e aforesaid liberty. if any, also stands disposed of. HWANI KUMAR MISHRA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No a h RAJESH KUMAR 2026.07.08 09:10 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Reproduced from the public record of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.